First Seen
2023-05-10T21:03:34+00:00
gemma3-27b-vision
Okay, here's an analysis of the Twitter post, broken down into relevant sections. Not all sections will be applicable; I will only include ones where there's a clear connection to the post's content. **Visual Description** The post is a screenshot of a Twitter post. It features a profile picture of a person with dark hair, appearing to be a Black woman. The profile name is “emmy rakete @cannibality”. The post consists of text which delivers a specific and pointed commentary on the legacy of Queen Elizabeth II and her relationship to colonialism. The post is timestamped September 8, 2022, and posted via “Twitter for Android”. **Critical Theory** This tweet operates squarely within the framework of Critical Theory, specifically as it relates to postcolonial critique. * **Deconstruction of Official Narratives:** The tweet directly challenges the dominant, often romanticized, narratives surrounding Queen Elizabeth II. The phrase “did not ‘preside over decolonisation’” uses quotation marks to signal skepticism and rejection of the idea that her reign was one of peaceful transition and progress. The author asserts that it was a struggle and a costly one. * **Power Dynamics:** The statement about “colonised people” and the cost of imperialism highlights the imbalance of power inherent in colonial relationships. The tweet positions Elizabeth II not as a benevolent figure, but as a representative of a system that actively harmed and oppressed colonized populations. * **Reclaiming Agency:** The phrasing "we won our freedom" and "we overcame in armed struggle" is crucial. It’s not a passively *received* freedom; it was actively *fought for* and *won* by colonized people. This demonstrates a reclaiming of agency and a rejection of the idea that liberation was a gift from the colonizer. **Marxist Conflict Theory** The post is deeply connected to Marxist Conflict Theory. * **Class Struggle & Colonialism:** While not explicitly stated in terms of class, the conflict between “colonized people” and the British empire (represented by Elizabeth II) reflects a form of power struggle. Colonialism, at its core, can be seen as an exploitative system where a ruling class (the colonizers) extract resources and labor from a subjugated class (the colonized). * **Means of Production & Control:** The armed struggle referenced is a clear assertion of attempting to wrest control of the ‘means of production’ (land, resources, self-determination) away from the colonial power. The statement implies that the violence inflicted by colonial forces exceeded any “benefits” received by colonized peoples, highlighting the exploitative nature of the system. **Postmodernism** While not the primary lens, elements of Postmodernism are present. * **Rejection of Grand Narratives:** The tweet challenges the “grand narrative” of British imperial history as one of benevolent rule and progress. It asserts a counter-narrative based on the lived experiences and resistance of colonized people. * **Deconstruction of Authority:** The tweet actively dismantles the symbolic authority surrounding Elizabeth II. By framing her as a “hated foe” rather than a “gracious liberator”, it questions the legitimacy of her power and challenges traditional sources of authority. Let me know if you’d like a deeper dive into any of these areas!
tesseract-ocr
@ emmy rakete@ @ @cannibality Elizabeth II did not "preside over decolonisation," colonised peoples shot enough British soldiers that the costs of imperialism outweighed the benefits and we won our freedom. Elizabeth was not a gracious liberator, she was a hated foe who we overcame in armed struggle. 7:07 PM - 9/8/22 - Twitter for Android
llama3.2-vision
The meme is a humorous commentary on the British monarchy's historical legacy. The text reads: "Elizabeth II did not 'preside over decolonisation, 'colonised peoples shot enough British soldiers that the costs of imperialism out