First Seen
2023-05-10T21:03:40+00:00
gemma3-27b-vision
Okay, let's break down this social media post through the requested theoretical lenses. This is a complex task, as the image *is* relatively sparse, but the structure invites a deeper read. **Visual Description** The image is a screenshot of a post from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) by user @SiobhánFTB (Siobhán O'Leary). The profile picture shows a dark-haired woman. The core of the post is a statement: “Passive voice isn't just a choice of journalists.” Below this, there's a series of statements structured in a list, with each point presented in two forms. The first version of each statement uses passive voice ("Rents have gone up," "Inflation's gone up," "Wages are stagnant," "Hospitals are understaffed"). The second version uses active voice, identifying an *actor* responsible for the situation ("Landlords raised rent," "Corporations price gouged," "Employers froze wages," "Hospitals understaffed their sites"). There is a checkmark before the statements using active voice and a red circle before the passive statements. The overall visual effect is stark. The paired statements highlight the shift in agency implied by the choice of voice. --- **Foucauldian Genealogical Discourse Analysis** This post is ripe for a Foucauldian analysis. Foucault focused on how *discourse* (language, ways of speaking and writing) shapes our understanding of reality and wields power. This post directly tackles that. * **Power/Knowledge:** The post is arguing that the *way* something is said (passive vs. active voice) isn’t neutral. Passive voice *obscures* the agents of change. It makes issues appear as natural or inevitable ("rents have gone up") rather than the result of deliberate actions ("landlords raised rent"). This is a key point for Foucault; knowledge (understanding of why rents are rising) is linked to power (the power to identify and challenge the responsible parties). * **Genealogy:** A genealogical approach would trace the *history* of how these passive constructions have become normalized in reporting. It would ask: When and why did it become common to talk about economic forces as if they were detached from specific actors? Who benefits from this linguistic practice? This could reveal how the language reinforces existing power structures. * **Discursive Formation:** The paired statements represent a challenge to a "discursive formation" – a system of thoughts, ideas, and practices that shapes how we understand a particular subject. The post is trying to disrupt the established way of talking about economic hardship and introduce a more accountable narrative. --- **Critical Theory** This post strongly aligns with the central tenets of Critical Theory, particularly the Frankfurt School tradition. * **Ideology Critique:** The post is a direct critique of *ideology* – the ways in which dominant beliefs and values obscure underlying power relations. By revealing how passive voice masks agency, the post exposes how language can be used to legitimize exploitation. The passive constructions conceal who is benefitting from rising rents, inflation, wage stagnation, and healthcare understaffing. * **Domination and Emancipation:** Critical theorists are concerned with uncovering systems of domination and working towards emancipation. The post's goal is to *unmask* the mechanisms of domination (landlords, corporations, employers, hospitals) and empower people to challenge them. * **Reason as Instrument of Domination:** The post indirectly suggests that seemingly "objective" reporting practices (using passive voice) can actually be instruments of domination. The pursuit of “neutrality” can serve to maintain the status quo. --- **Marxist Conflict Theory** This post provides a clear illustration of Marxist conflict theory. * **Class Struggle:** The post explicitly highlights the conflict between different classes. Landlords, corporations, and employers (the owning class) are presented as actively exploiting workers and consumers. The raising of rents, price gouging, wage freezing, and understaffing are all interpreted as strategies to maximize profit at the expense of others. * **Exploitation & Surplus Value:** Underlying the post is the idea that these actions represent the extraction of surplus value. Raising rents and prices allows landlords and corporations to capture more wealth, while freezing wages and understaffing increases the rate of exploitation. * **False Consciousness:** The use of passive voice can be seen as contributing to "false consciousness" – a state in which workers and consumers are unaware of their own exploitation and the true nature of the economic system. By revealing the actors involved, the post aims to break through this false consciousness and encourage collective action. --- **Postmodernism** While not *primarily* postmodern, some aspects of the post align with postmodern thought. * **Deconstruction:** The post “deconstructs” the seemingly neutral language of reporting. It reveals how passive voice isn't simply a stylistic choice but a technique that constructs a particular (and potentially biased) representation of reality. * **Critique of Grand Narratives:** Postmodernism often questions “grand narratives” – overarching explanations of history and society. The post implicitly challenges the notion that economic hardship is simply a natural consequence of market forces. It suggests that these issues are the result of deliberate actions by specific actors. * **Emphasis on Language & Representation:** Postmodernism places a strong emphasis on the role of language in shaping our understanding of the world. The post demonstrates how language can be used to obscure, manipulate, and control. --- **Queer Feminist Intersectional Analysis** This post, while not explicitly addressing gender or sexuality, *can* be viewed through an intersectional lens. * **Interlocking Systems of Oppression:** Intersectional feminism recognizes that various forms of oppression (class, race, gender, sexuality, etc.) are interconnected. The issues highlighted in the post (rising rents, inflation, wage stagnation) disproportionately affect marginalized groups, including women, people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and disabled people. * **Economic Justice:** The post speaks to the broader fight for economic justice, which is a central concern of queer and feminist movements. * **Deconstructing Power Dynamics:** The critique of passive voice can be seen as a broader effort to deconstruct power dynamics and challenge oppressive systems. Recognizing *who* is acting (and benefiting) from these economic policies is essential for building a more equitable society. **Important Note:** These are interpretations. The power of the post lies in its simplicity and open-endedness. It invites multiple readings through different theoretical frameworks.
tesseract-ocr
, Siobhan O'Leary a” @SiobhanFTB Passive voice isn't just a vice of journalists. ORents have gone up M) Landlords raised rent Olnflation's gone up Corporations price gouged OQWasges are stagnant MEmployers froze wages QhHospitals are understaffed M)Hospitals understaffed their sites etc
llama3.2-vision
The meme is a screenshot of a Twitter post from a user named @SiobhanFTB, with the caption "Passive voice is not just for journalists". Below the caption is a list of 7 examples of passive voice being used in incorrect situations, including: * "The door was opened by John" (instead of "John opened the door") * "The cake was eaten by the children" (instead of "The children ate the cake") * "The problem was solved by the team" (instead of "The team solved the problem") * "The car was driven by my brother" (instead of "My brother drove the car") * "The book was read by my mother" (instead of "My mother read the book") * "The house was cleaned by the maid" (instead of "The maid cleaned the house") * "The food was cooked by my sister" (instead of "My sister cooked the food") The meme is poking fun at the idea that passive voice is only used by journalists, and is actually used in many everyday situations.